Analysis of a Diversity Case

This lesson has been revised to reflect the December 1, 2006 amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, as they were re-written effective December 1, 2007.

This exercise is designed to help train beginning students in the analysis of judicial opinions. The student is asked to agree or disagree with assertions about a diversity jurisdiction case (Baker v. Keck). The computer responds to the student’s answers by evaluating them or asking further questions.

Lesson ID:

CIV05

Lesson Completion Time: 1.5 hours

CALI Topics: 1L - First Year Lesson Topics, Civil Procedure

Access to CALI Lessons is restricted to people affiliated with CALI member organizations and those who have purchased individual memberships. You may register or login to run CALI Lessons.